On August 11, the 2025 Global Digital Economy International Cooperation Forum, themed “Focusing on Global Digital Development, Co-Drawing a Blueprint for International Cooperation,” was held at the Hainan International Convention and Exhibition Center in Haikou. Hosted by the China Industrial Overseas Development Association, the forum discussed the confirmation of rights and the digitalization of physical assets, launched related compliance-collaboration mechanisms and a “special support plan for the digital ecosystem of the real economy,” and worked to deepen the integration of real-world scenarios such as cross-border e-commerce, supply chains, and consumption with digitalization.
Hyperchain was also invited to take part, speaking on asset rights recognition and technology implementation in industrial digitalization scenarios. On this occasion, how technology serves trust and compliance, and how it underpins industrial digitalization, became a recurring topic.
Asset rights recognition: bridging the real economy and digitalization
The essence of asset rights recognition is to faithfully express physical assets in the digital world, and to let them be defined, transferred, and verified.
The first step for physical assets to enter the digital world is rights recognition — first confirm ownership, then discuss transfer and value. And to do this step solidly, reliable underlying technology matters: ownership records must be tamper-proof, the transfer process traceable, and authorized access verifiable. When all of these are securely supported by technology, the link between physical scenarios and digitalization does not hang in the air. A judgment Hyperchain has long held is precisely this: trust and compliance are not piled up through after-the-fact review, but naturally supported by the underlying structure. When an asset’s ownership, transfer, and authorized access are all verifiable, traceable, and attributable on-chain, compliance is inherently embedded in the infrastructure.
In the forum’s exchanges, this point also resonated with industrial peers: to truly make digitalization take hold in real scenarios like cross-border trade, supply chains, and consumption, what decides success or failure is not the concept, but whether a verifiable, auditable, sustainably runnable foundational capability can be provided.
Parallel chains: the underlying base for real assets
For asset rights recognition and industrial digitalization to take root, the requirements on the bottom layer are manifold. Real assets are large in number and varied in type; their transfers ebb and flow over time, involve multiple parties, and cross borders — what they test is not single-point performance but systematic carrying capacity.
This is where the parallel blockchain comes in. Hyperchain’s parallel design lets ledgers dynamically shard on demand and process multiple ledgers in parallel, scaling smoothly with the size of the physical business; native cross-chain capability lets different assets, institutions, and domains interconnect and be verified; and a balance of pluggable consensus, permissionlessness, and customizability leaves room for regulatory compliance. For real business of the kind that is “multi-asset, multi-party, multi-link,” such a base can truly support it.
Conclusion
A single forum reflects, in fact, the industry’s thirst for “trusted infrastructure.” As more and more real scenarios embrace digitalization, what the market tests is no longer the novelty of a concept, but whether the technology can be stable, can be trusted, and can support both trust and scale. That is precisely the position Hyperchain has held unchanged throughout this discussion.
This is especially significant for real-world assets (RWA): tokenizing physical assets demands verifiable, rights-confirmed records on a deterministic chain — exactly the foundation a parallel blockchain is engineered to provide.